Sunday, May 26, 2019

Analysis of Hydrated copper sulphate Essay

Aim To determine the molecular formula of hydrated atomic number 29 convert.Requirements Hydrous sloven sulfateElectronic balanceEvaporating dishGlass rodTripod standBunsen burnerCrucibleProcedure First I weighed 3g of hydrous copper sulfate on electronic balance and began heating it in an evaporating dish on top of a Bunsen burner. After the reaction was complete I measured the sore weight to find a change in mass.Qualitative data After the reaction was complete, the colour changed from blue to white due to a way out of water crystals.Faint green tinge became evident and fine white powder was formed from crystals. Continued heating led to formation of oliver green colour. numerical data Original weight of hydrous copper sulfate 3gError in electronic balance 0.001g (provided by the teacher)Data collection Trial 11.96gTrial 21.87gTrial 31.94gData Processing To minimize the errors I conducted three trials and averaged the readings to find a more accurate attend to.= 1.93 g 0 .001 reposition in mass = (3 0.001) (1.93 0.001)= 1.07 0.002The change in mass was due to the loss of water crystals. Water (H20) has a molar mass of 18g. Therefore the change in mass must be equal to the mass of water devote in copper sulfate.No of moles of water evaporated = = 0.059 0.002molesThe molar mass of anhydrous copper sulfate is 159.6g.No of moles of = = 0.012 0.001molesIn the equation I took the no of moles of water as x because it is unknown.CuSO4.xH20 CuSO4 + xH2OAccording to the equation the mole ratio between copper sulfate and water is 1 x. Therefore 1x = 0.012 0.001 0.059 0.002x = = 4.9 0.588Conclusion Hence the x value can be rounded forward to 5 to get an integer answer. This means that in 1 molecule of hydrous copper sulfate there are 5 atoms of water present as crystals. The result is in addition equal to the literature value which was provided by the teacher and there seems to be no deviation because the answers are interpreted as integer and dec imal points are excluded. The only systematic error present was in electronic balance. Moreover random error could have been caused during heating of the brininess i.e. overheating or underheating. This error depends on the sight of colour change, therefore this is a very hard random error to eliminate.Evaluation As the answer is taken as integer, there seems to be zero error however still a lot of errors are possible while conducting this experiment. During the heating of hydrous copper sulfate there maybe some water crystals still left due to inappropriate stirring and overheated or underheated salts could have also caused error. Main error which is inevitable is the hydration of crystals after being heated. The reaction is reversible and the after heating there could have been water vapour in the bare which could have combined with the salt. Hence these can also lead to deviations in results. To improve upon these errors we must make sure that after the salt is heated, its weig ht must be measured immediately so that there is very less time gap between it. Furthermore proper stirring and care taken during heating can also minimize errors.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.